What Marx did not know is that the collapse of capitalism would come from the hand of types so little suspected, a priori, as Joan Laporta. What I did not know was that Peter Wheeler publicly reach such levels of intellectual and moral depravity.
Case Cristiano Ronaldo. The Real Madrid spends 94 million euros and is serviced by a football player. Manchester takes 94 million euros and get rid of this player. And the apocalypse. Joan Laporta will pick up with something similar to the economic management of Florentino Perez is imperialist. Peter Wheeler, the nettle, goes off to kindergarten with a comparison between the needs of third world and the expense of Real Madrid. As against the backdrop of global crisis and the alleged irresponsibility of spending so much money that is falling here and there.
A couple of quick thoughts. If Company X - say an electric - acquires 47% of the commercial Y - put a cement plant - 100 million euros is not only imperialist and obscene in times of crisis, it is hailed as a move to imitate a liquid injection on the market that generate proportional movements around it, create jobs that generate consumption that will generate direct and indirect taxes that generate "green shoots" in the economy. Am I someone explains the difference? "I said someone immorality of it? In fact "someone tells me what the hell we are talking about morals? Capitalism is immoral and imperialistic by definition, so we can put into question the system - and I look good - but not that one of its players observe their rules. The signing of Cristiano Ronaldo, sports performance aside, is a colossal financial move. Of those who claim the government every time they put a microphone in front and do not remember talking about the Falcon.
Is it immoral to spend 100 million euros on a player who spend it in three? Valencia asks for fifty kilos Villa and, following the logic of the nettle, which should make after admission is made to build schools in the Congo and finance the fight against malaria. Let me doubts that such a thing happen. If finally the Manchester card to Villa for 52 million euros this money will be spent on alleviating the debt of the whole Che and a bit of luck and common sense to resume construction of the stadium. A fully adequate moral stage it seems.
these days also heard the following thought. How do banks make loans to Real Madrid and not to individuals, SMEs and so many in need? Firstly, it seems only lend money to Real Madrid. Secondly, the banks what they do is a risk assessment (rather lax and so far we are where we are) based on which they decide. If a bank lends you ten is going to win seventies. Not financial charity but business prospects. Was not so urgent that the banks had money and confidence for all re-roll?
Returning to the case of Iberian Press, publishing group that owns the suprascrito of nettles, a champion of fair distribution of wealth. I guess that did not tell Moll eggs instead of buying the radio 97.7 a pasture will give the money to children's villages. I guess. Although, of course, the same is that yo soy un capitalista sin corazón y el peso de mi duro sombrero de copa me impide pensar.
Miren, si se trata de darle una patada en el culo a este sistema económico depredador, asesino y sin futuro, cuenten conmigo. Pero para hacer el gilipollas, no. Eso ya lo sé hacer yo solito. Y me sale de vicio.
